Corruption is a complex concept that can sometimes be difficult to distinguish from other crimes. For instance, stealing money from the government is commonly referred to as corruption, and the perpetrator is labeled a corruptor. However, why don’t we simply call them thieves?
In my opinion, the terms “thief” and “corruptor” are quite similar. The primary difference lies in the amount of money stolen. A corruptor typically steals a substantial amount of government funds, while a thief steals a smaller sum. Let’s establish a clear distinction between these terms to avoid confusion.
In a country like New Zealand, which is known for its low corruption rate, I wonder if there’s no corruption at all. I’m somewhat familiar with this issue. I recently read that even some universities have faced problems with the misuse of government funds. However, a powerful enforcement agency is responsible for investigating such instances.
What has been an intriguing practice for me is the practice of stealing money from the government. Last week, I met two men. One of them had recently divorced his partner. He shared with me how a citizen could manipulate the government.
In New Zealand, if your income falls below the minimum standard of living, the government provides subsidies from public funds to support your income. One type of subsidy is called the Supported Living Payment. You can read more about it and simulate the scheme from this website:
https://workandincome.govt.nz/online-services/index.html
However, there are some people who take jobs illegally. It could be, for example, a wife working illegally and only the husband working legally. Consequently, not all of their income as a household would be recorded. Then, they would receive subsidies from the government. This is what I call a thief. I heard that some people practice it just to have more money.
Perhaps in a country, you might not have many corrupt officials, but you could have many thieves. Do you have any solutions to address this issue?
Comments
Post a Comment